Obscured in the King James version of the Bible chapter often read at weddings and known for its descriptions of love is this line: “Now we see through a glass darkly, then face to face.” This sentence is the greatest promise I can imagine. One day, I will see clearly.
The promise follows another lesser-known verse about speaking, understanding and thinking like a child until one grows up and gives up childish ways. Much has been written alleging that, as one ages, one returns to childish ways. The allegation is specious.
In Dr. Atul Gawande’s Being Mortal, the author dissects the ways in which older Americans have been treated as they gradually develop the inevitable infirmities of old age. His Chapter Two, “Things Fall Apart,” is a decade-by-decade account of how major organs and systems of the body break down over time. There are steps people can take to slow that deterioration but basically, our bodies fall apart with time.
One’s first reaction might be “I should have drowned myself at age 40,” so disheartening is the news. Yet we all already understand the deal; we are not immortal, and our bodies are merely reflecting basic laws of physiology and physics. So, we press on, bravely accepting a few more aches and pains each year or a little less ability to hear.
Despite this physical falling apart, we are, remarkably, happier as a group than those who are younger, according to many studies. Gawande notes that, as we age, we shift toward “appreciating everyday pleasures and relationships rather than toward achieving, having, and getting.” What’s childish about this? If we find this more fulfilling, Gawande asks, why do we wait so long?
Gawande cites the research of Stanford psychologist Laura Carstensen to answer that question. In her work, Dr. Carstensen has established, through a series of experiments, that perspective matters. “When life’s fragility is primed, people’s goals and motives in their everyday lives shift completely. It is perspective, not age, that matters most.” Of course, People of a Certain Age, since we are among the older group in our society, our “fragility” is necessarily more “primed” than is someone’s who is thirty.
To offer the perspective of a person in his late 60s is what led to my writing these occasional pieces a year ago. Happily, my thoughts have prompted many readers to write about their own perspectives, telling their own stories. We are reflecting the perspective of age.
My perspective about mortality was affected by my reading Dr. Gawande’s book, given to me by a man whose vocation is running a first-rate retirement community in Honolulu. The first sentence of the book—“I learned a lot of things in medical school, but mortality wasn’t one of them”—grabbed me.
There were no lessons for Gawande about mortality but then who among us, we People of a Certain Age, has thought much mortality, unless we have faced a serious health issue or the loss of a loved one? Gawande’s criticism is that we have applied medical answers to issues arising from aging without thinking much about what might constitute a “good life,” even as we grow old.
He uses Ivan Ilich, from Russian literature, to illustrate how those around a dying person can mis-apprehend what is important to that person. He champions hospice for its focus on the person rather than the disease, a focus that often adds some higher quality days of living for the patient.
“Depends on your perspective;” I’ve said that often, sometimes to explain to my students why Presidents often think differently once in office, or coached my professional colleagues as they handled difficult situations with parents and students.
There is, of course, that glass of water that stands as a symbol of perspective. My favorite response to the image is that the glass is full; half water, half air.
For a class I co-taught at the University of Hawaii, I shared the following as an introduction to consideration of one’s “positionality” in doing practitioner action research.
“A triangular prism hangs from a thin filigree thread in my study window. I look through it into the yard outside whenever I notice the refracted colors moving slowly around the room as the day progresses. Peering through the prism, I watch just-budding forsythia blur into golden clumps of color, separated now from the distinct arching of branches and formed into a new version of spring. Later, as the sun sets, the forsythia reappear as golden, violet, blue, and orange dots across the table where I am writing. Both points of seeing present shifting versions of the environment surrounding me: these versions depend not only on the slight motion of the hanging crystal itself but also in the angles from which I look through and around the prism.” (J. Miller, in Teachers as Curriculum Creators)
Through a prism or a glass darkly, or the Revised Standard version’s “in a mirror dimly. One day we will be face to face. Until then, I will treasure the perspective unfolding in my life and wish you the same satisfaction. There is nothing childish about that.
Happy New Year!
Daniel E. White
December 29, 2015